Battle.net vs Call of Duty
If you need a Games & Comics API that's easy to integrate, go with Call of Duty.
Battle.net
Diablo III, Hearthstone, StarCraft II and World of Warcraft game data APIs
Call of Duty
Unofficial wrapper for the Call of Duty API with multi-language support.
Battle.net
- HTTPS supported
- CORS enabled for frontend use
- Requires OAuth setup
Call of Duty
- No authentication required
- HTTPS supported
| Feature | Battle.net | Call of Duty |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication | OAuth | None |
| HTTPS | Yes | Yes |
| CORS | Yes | Unknown |
When to use which?
Call of Duty is the better choice for quick prototypes and hackathons since it requires no authentication. Battle.net works directly from the browser with CORS enabled, making it better for frontend-only apps.